Instrukcja konserwacji i obsługi Bosch Rexroth Hagglunds Duc Lt2

Subskrybuj nasze sieci społecznościowe, aby być na bieżąco z najnowszymi aktualizacjami!

Komentarz

\m/

MBTI is okay despite it being vague and often missing the mark of how personalities are in real life. The thing that ruins it is the horrid community though. It's a cesspool of narcissists and stereotypes which could be blamed on things such as those sites that put % rarity on types like its a gacha game or something.

Although Personality Type is not science, it is not pseudoscience either. I would consider it as a very good scientific hypothesis that could be further improvised and refined.

For me, MBTI is a basic guide of how you act to everything. But it doesn't have to be 100% follow the guide, nor 100% abandon them. Depend on the people. That's why we aren't only seeing those 4 letters, but how much the percent number support those letters. Ex: I'm INFP, but I'm not having anxiety when ordering stuff at restaurant or answer the calling. Probably affected by my ESTJ mom who taught me patiently. My test also shows that my Perceiving is 51%, almost near to Judging type.

The MBTI is a fantastic resource that can provide a reasonably stable foundation upon which we might understand our strengths and weaknesses and therefore improve upon them, if that's our aim. It also helps me to understand that we all perceive and process reality quit differently and that there really is no need to judge. MBTI helps me to be much more flexible and understanding. -- ISTP.

“I did a biology degree. Did is a big word. I turned up to some lectures, sometimes.”

Height is continuous but you can still classify people into "short" and "tall" and just because 2 people are tall doesn't mean they're the same height. I think personality traits are like that. Continuous but we can draw our own line put it into categories and there is a lot of variability within a category.

I would say just by personal experience and also as a mother that our personality blueprint is decided way earlier than we normally think. Many people have talked about the first two years of a child’s life as being so fundamental in them forming their personality, but then as a mother when their personality is aloud to come out, i see it unfolding since their newborns, not us “filling up” their personality cup. It’s pouring out of them, is actually beautiful to see their sense of self being expressed more and more.

I think MBTI has gone way further then its original intention. I get that there are different cognitive functions, but I don’t understand the whole duality of it. For example, why can’t someone be an extroverted sensor in some circumstances but an introverted sensor in other circumstances? There are way too many variables oftentimes that makes putting anyone in a “ box” near impossible.

Honestly, I've been a little unsure about MBTI lately. I typed as an INFJ when I took the test. I've taken a few other tests, too, and get INFJ 9 times out of 10, and I have done some research into INFJs to learn more about it and I can honestly say it is spot on. About 99 percent of the things they say about INFJs applies to me. The issue is, my sister says the same thing about astrology. She is convinced it's real because of the research she has done and how her sign applies to her. But my sign? There are some major points in which it doesn't fit me. Sure, some of the blanket statements they say do, but then there are some major character traits about my sign--Gemini--that make zero sense with my personality. As a matter of fact, the sign that matches me very well is Pisces, which they claim Geminis are not compatible with. It just makes me wonder if Myers-Briggs might be the same way. Sure, this is an actually psychology/personality test, not just a "what year were you born?" or "where were the stars at in the sky when you were born?" type of thing, but I can't help but wonder if it could be blanket statements as well, especially since as much as INFJ really does fit me, so does INFP, ENFJ, and even ISFJ to an extent. I have "mistyped" as an INFP or an ENFJ before. The vast majority of the time I get INFJ, but occasionally, I have gotten one of those two. They really are quite similar to my personality. And then I even have some things in common with the ISFJ personality, even if I don't really considering myself to be what MBTI calls a sensor. I guess I'm just trying to say that I don't know if I can or should define myself by one of sixteen personalities available nor I am sure if that is who I will always be or if I will evolve over the years and then end up typing as a different personality for MBTI because I changed in the next decade or so. As understood as I felt when I read about INFJs, I'm not sure if I should allow myself to fit into this particular box and never grow out of it because this is all I think I can be now. There are some things we cannot change about ourselves. For example, I am fairly certain I am an HSP, or highly sensitive person, and if that is the case, it's a genetic trait. I will always be highly sensitive. But I could still learn ways to control my emotions better. A personality type isn't genetic, though, and people are always changing and growing. It's not always that people are afraid of labels, but sometimes we don't want to be defined by them and we dont want to let them rule our lives and never let us grow. I also find it a bit strange that Myers-Briggs will type the personalities of fictional characters or historical/famous figures who have never take the test. Sure, you can speculate that, but you can never know for sure, and I've seen every personality under the sun be argued for these characters and people and most of them do make sense for the person when you describe it. Maybe that's because we all have many sides to us and really can't be shoved into a single category.

Your humor is like those folded cloth napkins at a fancy dinner table... It's perfectly placed and elegant, yet very accessible! I share your attitude toward cognitive type (better term than "personality"?), and I applaud your ability to balance the evidence that your experience brings, yet also play devil's advocate to address potential criticisms AND possibly legitimate critiques. So... who would win in a chess game if you played yourself, Nathan?... XD Keep up the good work-- I [and everyone else, I'm sure] really appreciate the content and insights! Thank you! ^_^

My favorite analogy I saw was - cross your arms. You will typically always naturally, without thinking about it, cross one arm over the other. Now try to cross the arm once underneath, on top. You can do it, but it’s weird, and not preferred. Your cognitive preferences are the same, and very much engrained.

It's true. I asked, talked, predicted behavior of almost every humans around me and It's accurate.

I'm an ISFJ, 4 am means soon time to wake up so that I can feel perfectly ready and organized when the kids wake up! Good video, I find it strange how so many can see MBTI as limiting when in reality the option seems to be comparing every person to ONE standard.

I think there are three personality types.

I think the cognitive functions themselves are actually the more interesting and accurate part of the theory than the "types" because as you say dichotomies are not always as precise. Butttt that being said once you see it you can't unsee it and you're cursed with trying to type everyone you ever meet for the rest of your life lol

I am a newbie in terms of MBTI. I can state that I tested myself 4 times. Only. Every time I ended up where I first left - INTP. It kinda makes sense to assume I am one, already. However, MBTI, just like PCM let's say, are theories. They are not (yet) science. But as long as they have a huge panel to base the information on (more than 100K individuals) I must say they tend to look like interesting theories to me and I wish to know more. Anyways, I feel the need to say this, in response to your video: these are guidelines. One can never assume that if you are an I, you can never act like and E. And I will once again take my own case - I do recharge at home, alone, in my own world. But when it comes to speaking in public and dominating individuals, I ace that s**t ;) So what is an Introvert?

Thanks for your insight! I thought MBTI was entertaining at best and mostly like astrology, but the way you explained it made a lot more sense. A bit like everyone can get cancer, but some people will be more prone to developing the genetic mutations that cause the disease than others, or like some people lose weight more easily than others because of their metabolism... or like different models of cars have different pros and cons... I could probably go on like this for a while now. X)

The way I would put it is that MBTI describes the things that it measures reasonably well. But it doesn't describe the whole personality of an individual. The problems arise when people try to over-interpret what the type tells you. Every individual is unique, and we can't all be put into 16 categories, where everyone in that category is exactly alike. So when I listen to descriptions of my type (INTJ), I always think "that part sounds like me, but that other part doesn't quite sound like me".

you'd think that as an ENFP/ENTP type, id be scared of limiting myself when learning about this, but its actually helped me out. sometimes it describes me so well that it helps me understand myself and my identity and is helping me get to know what my natural instincts are, which thus helps in getting to know what careers would be best suited for me. I know this is the danger of doing this, but all my life I've been all over the place and I've always known I could do anything and am kinda sick of it now, just want to know exactly what I want to do

.

Zostaw komentarz

#0